WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court heard its first test on Wednesday of state abortion bans that have been enacted since the court upended the Roe v. Wade constitutional right to abortion. While the current case involves an Idaho abortion ban, the court’s ruling could have implications beyond that state. Idaho lawmakers have banned abortion except when a mother’s life is at risk. The Biden administration says the state law conflicts with a federal law requiring emergency room doctors to stabilize patients, no matter what, even if that means an abortion. How the court will rule is uncertain. The justices could make a major ruling — or they could rule narrowly on how Idaho’s state law interacts with the federal law, the the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act ( EMTALA ). A look at the key points in Wednesday’s arguments. POTENTIALLY FAR-REACHING IMPACTAttorneys for both sides warned that the justices’ ruling could affect women and doctors far beyond Idaho, changing how emergency rooms treat patients in many other states. “There are 22 states with abortion laws on the books,” said Attorney Joshua N. Turner, who represented Idaho. “This isn’t going to end with Idaho. … This question is going to come up in state after state.” |
What's in the $95 billion foreignThe Mets have placed catcher Francisco Alvarez on the injured list after a baserunning mishapNorth Korea says it tested 'superRevealed: The selfIndonesian police arrest 8 suspected militants, part of a banned extremist group with alNapoli coach apologizes to fans after lackluster loss at Empoli worsens title defenseI was diagnosed with stage 3 colon cancer aged 34 despite being in best shape of my lifeMorgan Wallen says he's 'not proud' of behavior after arrestCan US cities fine homeless people for sleeping outside?Pakistani province issues flood alert and warns of heavy loss of life due to glacial melting